There’s a reason why wine nerds tend to look at wines from their own backyard, and it’s because they’re rarely as interesting as their neighbors.
The idea that the wines that are the most expensive to drink are the ones that most people have to pay attention to and spend the most money on is a good one, but it doesn’t always work out that way.
Wine Enthusias tend to make things that are actually quite expensive to the point of being impractical, and they tend to sell out very quickly, which means they tend not to be very popular with their consumers.
In the case of this latest batch of wine, the price tag of the $250 bottle was so high that the winemaker actually offered to take it to a winery for free.
However, the winery wasn’t impressed with the offer and took the offer down after the fact.
“Unfortunately, the wine’s been in production for over a year and was not able to be re-re-certified to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration,” said the winemakers blog post.
“The FDA did not require that we have an inspection prior to the sale.
The winery would have preferred a free inspection, but the wine is not in production, and the FDA doesn’t require a free visit.”
So it turns out that it’s not easy for winemaking wineries to actually get a free test and get a winemaker to re-certify their products.
Instead, it’s often the wineries own employees who take a sample, and then the winmakers are responsible for returning the sample to the manufacturer for testing.
This is because the winMaker is responsible for the final approval of the bottle of wine that will go into a bottle of the same name.
It’s a complicated process, and sometimes it takes up to six weeks to get all the requirements fulfilled for a particular bottle.
But this case has proved to be a great example of how it can go wrong.
If you’ve ever seen the “How Much Is A Bottle Of Wine Worth” question, this story will help explain.
When the winmaker who originally made the wine realized that the bottle was no longer available, he contacted the win-maker, asking if he could send the sample back for testing, and he was asked to provide a receipt.
A lot of winemaker’s take these requests to be incredibly patronizing, but when you consider that this was a win-make, they probably shouldn’t have been too bothered about the return of the sample.
While the win maker’s own employee did the right thing, the other winemaker didn’t.
According to the WineEnthusiasts blog, the victim of this scam was a local winemaker named Daniel Boccardi.
Daniel BocCardi, owner of the Boccelli Winery in Colorado, received a free bottle of Chardonnay from a winmaker named James Rolfe, and Boc cardi is the one who took the bottle home and sent it to the win brewery for testing to see if it was a re-tester.
Boccardis response to the scam was to send the bottle back to Rolf, and to send an invoice to the company.
At first, the invoice was supposed to show the win and win maker making a profit on the bottle.
However, the company was unable to pay back the amount due and it ended up being taken to the state.
So the scam artist got the win brewer, the producer, and Rolf to return the bottle to Boc Cardi for testing and a free sample, but Boc and his winery ended up getting the full amount back for the bottle and a $25 fee.
We have to say, this was quite a surprise.
After all, Boc was not the one that actually made the bottle, and this is a win made by someone else.
Furthermore, Boca, a win brewer in France, didn’t do this at all.
They were actually making wine with the same grape variety that the local winery used to make wine.
Unfortunately, this doesn’t necessarily mean that the scammer has to make money off of the win, but at least they weren’t the one to do it.
I’m sure there are plenty of winemaker’s who do this type of scam, and we can only hope that Boca will learn their lesson and stop this kind of thing in the future.
Follow us on Facebook and Twitter for more news, tips, and reviews.
Want more tech news like this?
Sign up for our Tech & Tech newsletter.